Announcement
We've Moved
The forum here @ PSC has been fun, but we're going to transplant it in much more fertile pastures.If you already have a PSC account, use your email address to Request A New Password to get started @wetJacket
#1 Tue, Jun 10, 2008 3:55 PM
- ktm300
- Karma: 0
- Regular
Binding Placement
It is in the contradictions and disagreements that the knowledge is found. Since so many advocate the front boot placement as paramount, what is your thinking about ignoring it and focusing on the rear placement? If I place my rear at 17 with my normal close spacing, the front would be 28 5/8
#2 Wed, Jun 11, 2008 12:06 AM
- crdickey
- Karma: 1
- Regular
Re: Binding Placement
Rossi answered this question in another post.
"ChrisRossi
Administrator
Registered: Tue, May 15, 2007
Posts: 171
E-mail Re: RS-1 Fin SettingsCrdickey,
I recommend setting your back foot to my settings and keeping your spacing between feet the same way you have always skied. Do not even look at where your front foot is placed as I feel that the back foot is more important, especially for skiers with small feet. When I have skied on a 67" ski, I always run 17" to my rear foot. On a 66, I run 16 5/8", no matter what the ski, so far."
