Announcement
We've Moved
The forum here @ PSC has been fun, but we're going to transplant it in much more fertile pastures.If you already have a PSC account, use your email address to Request A New Password to get started @wetJacket
#1 Wed, Sep 8, 2010 3:47 PM
- Mart
- Karma: 0
- Rookie
Ski Advice
Hi,
I am currently running an HO burner 67" at 26-28MPH. I am 5'6'' and 135lbs. The ski is too long for my size/weight and does not turn much. My instructor told me that the ski was limiting my progression.
I was looking at the 2010 radar annex (65 or 66).
1.- Since I guess would be running in the 28-30MPH for a little while, i would like to know if the Annex would a pain at those low speeds or it will be fine?
2.- 65 or 66?
thanx
Mart
#2 Wed, Sep 8, 2010 4:17 PM
- HO410
- Karma: 9
- Slalom Mentor
- Skis At: Outlaw Lake
- Foot Forward: Right
Re: Ski Advice
65"
Give a serious look to the Senate or Senate C. It will give you a more stable and more forgiving than the Annex will.
#3 Wed, Sep 8, 2010 5:11 PM
- Mart
- Karma: 0
- Rookie
Re: Ski Advice
uhm the stability of the HO Burner is pretty annoying if you ask me 
I wish I could test drive ski's here in quebec 
HO410 wrote:
65"
Give a serious look to the Senate or Senate C. It will give you a more stable and more forgiving than the Annex will.
Last edited by Mart (Wed, Sep 8, 2010 8:16 PM)
#4 Wed, Sep 8, 2010 8:15 PM
- h20dawg79
- Karma: 10
- Water Ski Sage
- Skis At: Old Hickory Lake, TN.
- Foot Forward: left
Re: Ski Advice
There's No comparison in the stability or perf. between the Senate and the Burner. I would lean toward a Sen. "C" and it will take you from were you are right now all the way through -35/34mph... No problemo!
"Warning" -the Surgeon General has determined; That the preceding statements accurately reflect the views and opinions consistent with "DSS" (Delusional Slalomitis Syndrome) a highly contagious life altering condition... (Handle with Extreme care & Patience)
